Tag Archives: defective products
“Predominance” Requirement Clarified in New Seventh Circuit Decision by Judge Posner
Sears customers alleged in a class action against Sears, Roebuck and Co. that their Kenmore-brand Sears washing machines had two defects. One defect occurred in their front-loading “high efficiency” washing machines. Because of the low volume of water used in … Continue reading
Tags: breach of warranty, certification, class, class action, consumer, consumer fraud, consumer protection act, consumer protection attorney, consumer protection laws, consumer protection lawyer, consumer protection rights, consumer protection rights attorney, consumer protection rights lawyer, deceptive advertising, defective products, misleading advertising, Rule 23
Leave a comment
District Court certifies class in Bayer vitamin suit
On February 3, 2012, another court distinguished the Supreme Court’s holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Dukes, 131 S. Ct.2541 (2011). In Johns v. Bayer Corp. et al., 2012 WL 368032 (S.D. Cal.) the District Court for the Southern District … Continue reading
Tags: arbitration, Bayer, breach of warranty, class action, Class Action attorneys, class action lawyers, consumer class action, consumer fraud, consumer protection act, consumer protection attorney, consumer protection laws, consumer protection lawyer, consumer protection rights, consumer protection rights attorney, consumer protection rights lawyer, deceptive advertising, defective products, dodd frank, Dukes, Dukes class action, misleading advertising, Rule 23, Wal-Mart
Leave a comment
Apple Off the Hook in ios.4 Consumer Class Action
California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) is often depended upon by plaintiffs’ counsel in consumer actions. But recently, Judge Anthony J. Battaglia of the Southern District of California, granted Apple’s motion to dismiss a claim brought pursuant to California’s Consumer … Continue reading
Tags: apple class action, arbitration, billing fraud, breach of warranty, class action, CLRA, consumer, consumer class action, consumer fraud, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, consumer protect, consumer protection act, consumer protection laws, consumer protection rights, consumer protection rights attorney, consumer protection rights laweyer, debt collection abuse, debt collection laws, deceptive advertising, defective products, dodd frank, fair debt collection, fair debt collection act, ios.4 class action, iphone class action, lender liability, misleading advertising, predatory lending, unfair debt collection
Leave a comment
Featured Posts
JPMorgan Loses Bid to Prohibit Class Arbitrations
Social Media Accounts Are Fair Game in Discovery
Ninth Circuit Revives HAMP Claims Against Wells Fargo
Court Certifies Class of Rite Aid Store Managers Under Rule 23